This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
what it needs for improvement is references. The deWP style of general referencing is not considered acceptable at enWP. I see the German article has many more references, so you could at least add them. Don't be concerned at adding multiple references ot the same source--there are ways to combine them, and if you don't know them, I can easily do that. You do not have to reference every sentence, but you should indicate for every paragraph what is the best source for it. In addition, there undoubtedly exist some English references, at least for the general aspects--try to find them.
(This should be done with the other article also--I accepted it because in that case it's fairly obvious from the title which item is a source for each section, but it is still subject to challenge, and you really need to do it before it gets challenged. DGG ( talk ) 07:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC) .[reply]
