This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
A fact from Patricia Schultz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 January 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that Patricia Schultz, the author of 1,000 Places to See Before You Die, would travel to Florence if she could only take one more trip before she herself died? Source: "Italy was the subject of Schultz’s very first book. When pressed about where she would go if she could only take one more trip in her lifetime, she picked Florence, where she lived after college. She’d rent an apartment there, just like she did back then, and do her best to blend in like a local." Chicago Tribune
QPQ: - Pending Overall: Hook is interesting and cited (I added a slightly differently phrased alt). The article and sources look good, but is there something other than FORBESCON that we can use for the 100 Reasons to See the World book? Although technically, I think it's fine because it just counts as a self published source for a neutral fact. Once qpq is done this should be ready. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@BuySomeApples: Thank you for the review. I don't have much issue with the FORBESCON as there is nothing controversial cited to it. Feel free to remove it if you feel differently. Thriley (talk) 23:24, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
- Pending
Hook is interesting and cited (I added a slightly differently phrased alt). The article and sources look good, but is there something other than FORBESCON that we can use for the 100 Reasons to See the World book? Although technically, I think it's fine because it just counts as a self published source for a neutral fact. Once qpq is done this should be ready. BuySomeApples (talk) 04:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)