Talk:Patapon/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 10:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.
If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)
I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.
Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.
Immediate Failures
[edit]It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
-It contains copyright infringements
-It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}).
-It is not stable due to edit warring on the page.
-
Links
[edit]Prose
[edit]Lede
[edit]- It combines elements of rhythm and strategy - feels a bit early to talk about this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- The story seems a bit high up, could we talk about some development or release before this? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- link IGN. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- The game led to two sequels for the PSP; Patapon 2 and Patapon 3, and a port to the PlayStation 4. - perhaps mention the port (and when) before mentioning the sequels. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- The lede doesn't seem to mention Patapon at all. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:32, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
General
[edit]- Seems to be a bit of a lack of wikilinks in this article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- are there any wikilinks in particular that you believe would be beneficial?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Each unit can have a maximum of 6 or 3 troops depending on the type - three or six MOS:NUM Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- PSP (○ × △ □) - we really don't need the buttons. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done Although, i do believe simply saying "Face buttons" is beneficial to first-time readers.
- During fever, Miracles can be created by performing the Juju command. - what? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- Patapon was developed by Pyramid and produced by Japan Studio. The game was designed by Hiroyuki Kotani. - merge. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- Could also mention the publisher. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- Japan Studio is listed as a developer in the infobox. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- Omotesando has an accent. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- The game was well-received among critics, holding an aggregate score of 86 out of 100 on Metacritic - we generally just say what metacritic says, so "Patapon recieved "generally favourable reviews" according to review aggregator website Metacritic (eg)
- Done
- When there is an author, we should state them in prose. I.e - "GameSpot's Justin Calvert gave Patapon cited its excellent art design and innovative gameplay" Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done
- Any sales details for the PS4 version? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I wish I could have found some, but I didn't. I can look again.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Sequels could be a little bigger - could we say if they were successes, or any other details? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- The sequels are currently my weakness. I can cover them, but it's almost like creating mini-articles for them. it may take me some time.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- No issue, I'll assume you'll put something there in a bit, I'm happy to pass for now. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:43, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Review meta comments
[edit]- I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:28, 15 March 2021 (UTC)