Talk:Pat Seerey/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 13:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Article looks pretty stable. I'll review it shortly. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 13:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
- Well-written
a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
- The article is excellently written with one or two tiny errors which I have fixed as I read the article through.
- Verifiable with no original research
a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines
c. It contains no original research
- The sources used in this article are acceptable and contain the necessary information.
- Broad in its coverage
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic
b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
- The article is very broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.
- Neutral
It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
- The article is neutral and does not included personal opinions or statements.
- Stable
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
- The article is mainly written by one major contributor and the content does not significantly change from day to day (edits made in preparation for the GA-nomination will be ignored). It's also stable no edit wars or disputes.
- Illustrated
a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
- The article is illustrated with one image in the infobox which is uploaded and from Commons and is a public domain.
- Pass, fail or hold?
- This article meets all the GA-requirements and I'm therefore going to pass it. Excellent job. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 14:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)