Talk:Pastoral lease

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Law Low‑importance

	Australia portal Pastoral lease is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

earlier comment

Hello SatuSuro, yes I am new to Wikipedia and have an interest in the establishment of simmilar references to pastoral leases/runs simmilar to the WA pages for Victoria. Through my general knowledge I know that the term run was used in the early years of land settlement. As squatters moved out from Sydney, Melbourne and Portland the aquired land just by staking claim to it or squatting on it (hence squatters) and this land became known as a "run" and later as it was surveyed and given title, then they became known as leases, but still the term run carried on. Later in the cases where land was fertile it was further subdivided for closer settlement. Times dates names for this would be plentiful in the history books. I just need time to put something together.

In wikipedia there are 778 references to pastoral run, and in google I was able to find reference in all states except Tasmania. However, I concede that lease is a more specific term, where by pastoral run, pastoral property, and pastoral land may be more loose terms applying mostly to pastoral leases but also other land at different times. Thus these names should be mentioned in a secondry context and not in the first sentence. As for citation look under "Austalian National Dictionary" Pastoral,a. As yet I haven't figured out how to add citations. (Pjbarber (talk) 04:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pastoral lease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]