Talk:Pasto Ventura/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 00:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Criteria
[edit]1. Prose ✓ Pass
2. Verifiability ✓ Pass
3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass
4. Neutral ✓ Pass
5. Stable ✓ Pass
7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass
- Passing. Hog Farm (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]1.
- Per MOS:OVERLINK, I'm not sure if Argentina needs linked
- Unlinked. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- Link Los Nacimientos, make sure you get the right one from the dab page Los Nacimientos, they both seem to be in the applicable province
- Linked, bit I can't say that I am very sure on this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
- "deposits of lapilli, lava bombs and scoria" - Link scoria
- "7 volcanic domes,[6] 2 maars and 3 tuff rings;" - I think MOS:NUMERALS applies here
- Mafic is a duplink
- All sections should be summarized in the lead, the climate and vegetation section isn't.
- Both done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
2.
- The reference titles and author's name shouldn't be in allcaps
- Should refs 4 and 5 have accessdates since the sources are online?
- Ref 35 same as above
- Done, added to 4 and 5 but not to 35 as that is a journal article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
3.
4.
5.
6.
- Is an image of this freely available? I understand that with many subjects there isn't one.
- Not as far as I know. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
7.
Good work. Placing this one of hold, only a few things to address. Hog Farm (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)