Talk:Partition (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a solid article. I'll have this to you within 48 hours ☯ Jaguar ☯ 18:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

""Partition" is a song recorded by American singer Beyoncé for her self-titled fifth studio album (2013)" - I'd write this as "Partition" is a song recorded by American singer Beyoncé for her self-titled fifth studio album released in 2013 - just a suggestion though
The lead summarizes the article well, so this passes
"The production was handled by Timberlake, Beyoncé, Dean, Boots" - why is 'Boots' under his pseudonym here whereas everybody else mentioned isn't?
"I got to the mic, I'm like, 'Oh, press Record'"? - should record be capitalized?
"Midway the following year, the writers of Spin magazine placed it at number four on the list of the 57 best songs so far" - this part is unreferenced, and also "midway the following year" sounds like guesswork, could it be pinned down to June/July 2014?
The first paragraph in the Synopsis section is unreferenced

References

Ref 55 is dead
This link is dead too, but I'm not sure where it is used in the article

On hold

Like the last one I reviewed, this is overall a well written and solid article. The concerns above are relatively minor, so I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until everything is addressed. Thanks ☯ Jaguar ☯ 17:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Close - not listed

I'm sorry to do this, but I'll have to close this due to inactivity. It is such a nice article though, so if all of the above can be addressed please come to me again and I will probably 'quick-pass' it like I did to the inactive Rocket GAN. Thanks ☯ Jaguar ☯ 16:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]