Talk:Partial current

Proposed Merge with Cathode

I agree with the proposal Apau98 (talk) 11:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree to merge. This page is simply a definition of Cathodic and Anodic current, and unless someone can show how it can be expanded to require its own page, it seems that it would fit well into the Cathode page. Nihola (talk) 20:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree. Gierszep (talk) 02:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of Cathodic Current has been added to the wiki article on Cathode, so it is now in a sensible place. This article is no longer needed. Gierszep (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree: I moved the page to "Partial current" (a more general term for both anodic current and cathodic current) and I expanded it, so now I think this page is quite independent from other pages. --Aushulz (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not support to merger. The concept of partial (anodic or cathodic) current is not a trivial one, can be easily misunderstood. It is used in multiple articles, there will no doubt be more in the future. It is sensible that the terms be properly defined is in its own article, with the discussion that they deserves, and pointers, e.g., to the IUPAC definition. Stan J. Klimas (talk) 22:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]