Talk:Parrying dagger

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Blades (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blades, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BladesWikipedia:WikiProject BladesTemplate:WikiProject BladesBlades articles

Fencing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fencing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to fencing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FencingWikipedia:WikiProject FencingTemplate:WikiProject FencingFencing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Picture

OK, I sort of got it. It's not quite showing up, but I got the link in half-decent. Check out the "Swordbreakers" section.

You know what, I got the picture in, but it would look a lot better in a different section. I tried moving it, but it just showed up as an URL. Anyone know how to fix that?

Hey, I put the picture in for you. It's under the REFERENCES section. Pretty neat!

Here's a picture: [1]. Someone add it, please?

This can't be real. Is it? Theblindsage (talk) 09:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Issue

I think that the title of the page was confusing. I'm using general info for a school project, but I kept searching for "main-gauche" from the list of daggers. I finally found the link using Google.

Calling it a sword breaker is kind of speculative. It might break a smallsword, but I have a hard time believing it could break anything else.

Theblindsage 09:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

This article needs to be better referenced. As it is, the only source that a sword breaker was a real weapon is a rather dodgy webpage that itself seems to be going on hearsay; according I've removed it (and reformatted the WoT references so it is clearer what their presence was sourcing). --Gwern (contribs) 21:28 8 May 2007 (GMT)

I added those sources. Thanks for the reformatting - the WoT references look much better. However, I somewhat disagree that the sword breaker reference is a dodgy website. The author appears to have put in a lot of time and effort; it is also non-commercial. I think what you mean is that it is not authoritative. If so, I agree, but it is useful in that it has a picture of a sword breaker (and doesn't offer to sell it, unlike every other website I could find). I have therefore readded it, along with a more authoritative reference (which unfortunately lacks any pictures). The authoritative reference verifies everything in the other reference. A quick Google search verifies the picture. Really, a book reference would be better, but I don't have one available...until one is found, I think these will have to do. If you have or can borrow/get [http://amazon.com/s/ref=sr_nr_n_0/103-2640701-1651053?ie=UTF8&rs=1000&keywords=sword%20breaker&rh=n%3A1000%2Ck%3Asword%20breaker%2Cn%3A9 Daggers and Bayonets], it could perhaps be suitable.

If you disagree, feel free to revert me and post here. Thanks! 124.148.61.125 16:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eraser

A paragraph's worth of text was removed (I presume accidentally, as it rendered the article useless) so I reinstated and rephrased it.

I have a reference - a children's history book, Exploring History: Ancient Weapons, by Will Fowler (ISBN 1-84038-692-4), but I'm not sure if it's either a valid source or, if so, how to cite it... Noaqiyeum 00:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! Generally, published works are more reliable sources than web pages (the best this article has at the moment). As long as the book is not too simple, it should be fine. WP:Reliable sources goes into more detail and if you're still not sure, you can discuss it with other editors at the noticeboard linked on that page.

WP:Citing sources talks about how to cite. It mentions three styles of citing; this page is using Footnotes, so it would be best to use that one. These citation templates make citing much easier - you supply the raw data, they handle the formatting. If you get bogged down, or run out of time, etc, just put in as much information as you can about the source and I or someone else will fix it up. The citation is the important thing, not the formatting!

124.148.116.66 14:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really?

"One thing of note is that sword-breakers were not spring-loaded daggers which had sides snap out to meet the guard. These faux-historical stainless steel knives are sold in various places, but are not historically accurate."

Might want to check this article: http://www.myarmoury.com/feature_spot_combo.html

Such weapons did indeed exist. Macroidtoe 18:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm missing something, but from what I can see that page doesn't mention sword breakers - the closest thing is a fixed sword catcher on a shield. 124.148.74.39 12:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are indeed renaissance daggers that 'pop open' into triplicate blades. http://www.myarmoury.com/feature_euroedge.html#parrying But I think the idea that such daggers can 'pop shut', scissors style, to break blades, probably comes from the Three Musketeers movie, where Porthos has such a device. There seems to be some confusion with the main-gauche style blade found on page 41 on this book: Daggers and Bayonets by Logan Thompson (Hardcover - Nov 1, 1999), which had notch for catching the blades of civilian rapiers, circa 1650. The swords to be broken would be of a similar time, which would mean civilian dueling rapiers, smallswords, and court-swords, more similar to the modern epee. Theblindsage (talk) 09:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]