Talk:Parque de la Ciudad

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Culture of Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Parque de la Ciudad, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled

==The Park Opens Section== Some corrections! (12/1/2011)

"The Tower reached 208 m (682 ft) upon topping out in 1982, and became the tallest structure in Argentina.[2] Platforms 1 and 2 were completed, and a revolving restaurant like that in the CN Tower in Toronto, Canada, was installed by the time the park was inaugurated as Parque Interama on September 21, 1982."

FAKE FAKE FAKE! Platforms 1 and 2 were not completed. Official there a restaurant and a cafe. NEVER PROJECTED A REVOLVING RESTAURANT! That is a myth, an urban legend!

The platform 3 (the highest) was completed. Panoramic viewpoint works since 1985 (the year the tower was opened)

"The park struggled with setbacks from before its opening, however. Cost overruns typified much of its construction (notably the space needle, whose Us$10 million cost was triple the estimate)."

It's not completely true. The cost of the tower was 10 million. The surcharge was applied in the construction of foundations and assembly.

"The 1980 bankruptcy of the chief stockholder in Interama, Banco Sidesa, forced the scrapping of a number of its more ambitious attractions, and delayed the inaugural."

Error! most ambitious attractions were built! (Tower, Aerogondolas (Sky Ride) and "Vertigorama" a double roller coaster) The final masterplan by Richard Battaglia (1980), shows all existing facilities.

The proposed expansion plan, is what never came true. (That included about 30 attractions installed within 6 years after the opening) That's the confusion.

"The park itself failed to attract the number of 15 million yearly visitors projected by the city. Annual attendance reached 1.1 million in 1985, and declined by two-thirds afterwards"

This is absolutely wrong! The Park's Annual Attendance was estimated at between 2 and 3 million annually! NO 15!

"The addition of an Imax cinema was later planned; but was ultimately canceled, leaving an abandoned structure resembling Greek ruins"

Imax Cinema, was not planned later! The original master plan of 1979 shows the building in its place! The construction of the park began in 1980. Imax Cinema was one of the first buildings of the place!, But was never completed. All parts of the Imax cinema (projector, movies, sound system, cooling system, screen, etc ...) still remains in the storage sector of the park!

"The park was reopened for the nation's Bicentennial in May 2010; amid ongoing refurbishment and replacement of inoperable rides, the reopening included the addition of a cultural center and art gallery"

The park NOT was reopened in 2010! It was in 2007 and has since been open to the public. No ride was dismantled! all remain in the park! No cultural center, and neither art galleries!

I suggest you review the Spanish version of this page. It contains accurate information on the park today.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.254.1.9 (talk) 05:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting

I took out this phrase. I couldn't make heads or tails of it:

and they were clever in the floor it has more than enough wooden tacos, waiting until the one numbers that they took inscriptos in their parts of it assembles it coincided with the I already number of the tract installed.

I take it to mean that some part of the park was prefabricated, and then assembled according to numbers on a foundation. Feel free to use my language or to otherwise make it clear if you can figure out how.--Levalley (talk) 00:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I took out this phrase:

and the crane left their functions to pass him/her the post to the crane climber that would continue with the one it assembles from the 120 meters until the culmination of the Tower.

I can only guess at what it means. Feel free to contact me about including the information, though, I have some idea of what it means.--Levalley

Still working on it. Plan to finish tonight.--Levalley (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's another sentence I had to leave out:

In each attraction there was an or but cranes that moved with caution, since the cables of Aerogondolas were spread and they were already testing the journey.

I just can't tell, at all, what it means. Apparently there's an attraction "Aerogondolas" that wasn't or isn't quite finished? It would be good to mention the attraction, but not unless there's a grammatical statement about it.

It would also really help this article if someone would add dates. Is the thing still operational? Is it really for military only? There are many confusing aspects to this article, but they are not copyediting issues, so I'll change the tag.Levalley (talk) 23:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Aerogondolas" is a Sky Ride. The Sky Ride was installed, while the construction of other atraccciones ongoing. (1/12/2011) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.254.1.9 (talk) 05:00, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More than anything, this article needs to be updated - it seems frozen in the 70s and 80s. There are problems of translation and tone, but I find the current version acceptable as to grammar, syntax, etc., so I removed the copyedit tag. Feel free to contact me at my talk page if more is needed.Levalley (talk) 00:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]