Talk:Paronychodon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paronychodon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zapsalis

Zapsalis redirects here, but the article states it might be a synonym of Richardoestesia? FunkMonk (talk) 23:42, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Larson & Currie 2013 acknowledge Zapsalis as a valid separate taxon (see page 9: "Zapsalis abradens, in the current study, is regarded as valid because the distinct morphology is absent in the type specimen of Dromaeosaurus albertensis"). It therefore needs an article of its own.--MWAK (talk) 09:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, haven't read the paper, though I took the photo from there. Yup, seems it needs an article. I see there's already one in Dutch, wonder who made it! FunkMonk (talk) 20:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We Dutch are blessed with the gift of Foresight :o).--MWAK (talk) 07:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]