Talk:Parnell Commission

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Most of what I've written is fairly disjointed and mostly semi-plagirised from the wikipedia article on Parnell.GiollaUidir 16:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first paragraph of this article implies that it was an attempt on the part of the Parnell Judges themselves to descredit Parnell. This hardly seems likely - may I suggest that you change this wording?

Can we clarify which legal costs were paid by The Times?

The Wikipedia article on Pigott seems to imply that The Times, in addition to damages, agreed to pay Parnell's legal costs. The present article does not make this clear, and could be read as implying that The Times merely paid its own legal costs. (The article on Parnell mentions only the damages, not the costs). Could someone with better access to the sources please clarify this point. Thank you. Nandt1 (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]