Jump to content

Talk:Parker Molloy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Name

[edit]

Since someone is deciding to violate WP:GenderIdentity and MOS:Identity, let's chat.

MOS:IDENTITY states:

[F]or terms relating to gender[, ...] we favor self-designation, even when source usage would indicate otherwise. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Direct quotations may need to be handled as exceptions (in some cases adjusting the portion used may reduce apparent contradictions, and " [sic]" may be used where necessary).

Why does Wikipedia refer to people according to their gender self-identification? Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people says "the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment", and on 9 April 2009 the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees passed a resolution urging that special attention be paid to neutrality, verifiability and human dignity. As Wikipedia's article on the subject explains, "gender identity is a person's private sense, and subjective experience, of their own gender." We accept the person's latest identification of their gender, as documented in reliable sources, at face value. To do otherwise — 'to refer to transgender or genderqueer people by names or pronouns which disregard their gender identities, i.e. to misgender them — is deeply offensive and causes harm'.[1][2][3]

73.191.40.183 (talk) 16:35, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Emily Esque[reply]

See Wikipedia:Gender identity, The Wachowskis (includes birth name), Chelsea Manning (includes birth name).--50.249.27.137 (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Those analogies are inapt. Both Ms. Wachowski and Ms. Manning were notable under their former names, thereby making the presence of their former names relevant. No such case can be made here; the only reason to include Ms. Molloy's former name is prurient interest, which is not allowed under WP:Gender Identity or MOS:Identity Emily Esque (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2014 (UTC) Emily Esque[reply]

Lea T --50.249.27.137 (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Parker Marie Molloy. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Parker Molloy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion

[edit]

Parker just mentioned she'd rather have this page deleted: https://bsky.app/profile/parkermolloy.com/post/3lbl3dt6lxs2h

> I'd feel safer in this world if didn't have a Wikipedia entry, to be honest. I don't think i meet notability criteria. If anyone can push to try to get it deleted altogether, I'd be fine with that. Drewmca (talk) 23:19, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Drewmca: U1 explicitly does not apply to article space. See also WP:OWN. If you feel that any of the material on the page fails WP:BLP, then be bold and remove it. If you think the subject does not meet our notability guideline, you may propose deletion or start an articles for deletion discussion. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]