Talk:Paris metropolitan area/Archives/2007/September

Aire urbain "more similar" in concept to the US Metropolitan area?

Are you joking? The aire urbaine and the US metropolitan area have nothing at all in common - county borders? Stop dreaming and start informing, please. THEPROMENADER 13:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Can you drop your aggressive and uncompromising tone? Also, you're not the sherrif of Wikipedia in charge of policing the encylopedia. Is it possible that you LEAVE ME ALONE when I make an edit and not revert or write angry messages ANYTIME I make an edit? You are the most obsessive and confrontational person I have ever seen on this encyclopedia. Just realize that you're one in a thousands editors here, you're not in charge of controling, policing or redressing whatever wrongs, real or in your imagination. You're not anymore important than the other thousands of editors. Get it? Now I won't answer your agressive and excessive message, as it would only lead to more agressive and excessive messages. Start behaving normaly, write polite and balanced messages, and perhaps we can work from there. As you long as you keep writing completely excessive things such as "aire urbaine and the US metropolitan area have nothing at all in common", I don't see how a discussion is possible. Hardouin 14:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

(grin) Stay true to fact and you will never have any problem from me. You don't think that statements that have citations that counter each other are not "wrong"? Taking statistics from one area and saying they belong to another is not wrong? You don't seem to think so, but that doesn't mean it isn't. The fact of the matter, and the final say in the matter, is that what's written must match the sources - and reality. You do your best to make your POV seem "real" by carefully selecting "sources" to back it, but doing this is akin to writing an article saying that the earth is flat, and selecting only references to articles that support this *cough* point of view. Is that reality? Not. Making authorative declarations that "sound" real or incredulous (in hoping for ignorant ears) about the same doen't make your opinions any more real, either.

Your involvement here is not a healthy one - you seem to have placed a too great a stake in the presence of your personal opinions here. If your real goal is to inform, then there is no reason that you should not give the facts as they are at their origins - especially when they are available everywhere. THEPROMENADER 14:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)