Talk:Parinamika

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent edits

This appears to be two different "organizations". The first, as noted in the original article and reliable sources, was a NGO founded by law students to implement social change. It appears to have gone defunct. The website expired (in 2012) and was picked up by marketing/SEO people (in 2022). This second group, and the "awards" which all appear to be fellow SEO scams or pay-to-plays, will need to establish a new article asserting notability without pretending to be the old org. Thanks. Given that it was just created this year, and that much of the site is fictitious, that seems unlikely. Kuru (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello user, I’m a founder of Parinamika. I have recently seen that you have removed all of the information from the article because it seems a scam to you but you are wrong. We were inactive for few years because of financial problems that we were facing, but now we have started again, and working with the new team and i, myself have removed the information and intact my name is their now which I removed. Calling this as a scam straight away without confirm is not a positive review. If you want to see any of the government document (Articles of Incorporation or Tax Filing) kindly provide your email we will mail it to you. Thanks :) Rkayala (talk) 16:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable, third-party sources not based on junk SEO or press releases would be needed that explicitly connect this to the original organization along with some history on why it is now self-promoting "PR experts" running the show would be required. Frankly, I don't even see the original organization as notable, certainly not the "new" SEO version. Kuru (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so some of them are a PR article to promote our event but that doesn’t mean it’s a scam. We do have collaborated with agencies as we are starting after so long, we need to get connected to the audience so we are focusing on our online presence so we organised a webinar and awards and added all of the information. Rkayala (talk) 17:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are one of the people originally involved in this organization, you need to reset your moral compass. Kuru (talk) 17:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand, we have changed few things related to our organisation as earlier this organisation was made just to create awareness about Right to Information Act, 2005, but now we have added new goals to educate poor children’s and provide shelters to the needy. As we were already having the platform and its rights with us, so we started it under our organisation. Rkayala (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kuru, as i have cleared everything openly still you have killed our online presence by mentioning that it was an organisation. If you don't want to allow us to add anything atleast, make it an active organisation so that people won't get confused. Rkayala (talk) 19:44, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rkayala Your organizations web presence is not the responsibility nor care of Wikipedia. I suggest you focus your efforts elsewhere. CUPIDICAE💕 19:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CUPIDICAE I do understand, but do you support using the wrong information on Wikipedia? An organisation which is active, you guys are showing that it is defcunt. What the behaviour is this? Rkayala (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CUPIDICAE I am not a wikipedia editor or a long term user, doesn't mean i will sit and watch my hard work getting vanished in seconds because of Admins like you. I have given my 13 years to this organisation, not to see it dead. We had made many plans for upcoming days but you guys added more difficulties on our way. Rkayala (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rkayala your ties to the organization are irrelevant. Wikipedia doesn't host content because an organization wants it to say something. I suggest you move on otherwise you're going to wind up blocked entirely. CUPIDICAE💕 21:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CUPIDICAE So, if i will not stop commenting, speak what is right, you'll get me blocked?

Okay get me blocked, i will do what i can.

And remember, you have made a mistake, by mentioning my organisation as dead, while it is active. I only asked remove the past words, and make it an active organisation. Rkayala (talk) 21:57, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]