Talk:Parikh–Doering oxidation

Okay okay, all in all..

First, please translate this article into other languages.
(Bitte übersetzen diesen Artikel in andere Sprachen.)
(S'il vous plaît traduire cet article en d'autres langues.)
(他の言語には、この資料を翻訳してください。)
（请协助将这篇文章翻译成其他的语言。）
Second, please help correct potential errors.
Third, if you've got any problems, contact me.
Gesalbte (talk) 03:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove silly arrows

I cant do it myself but please someone remove those silly red arrows in the Nicolau synthesis..... they are wrong and not professional at all. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devvochem (talk • contribs) 08:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"without formation of significant amounts of dimethylsulfide as a side product"

Please correct the falsely (re)introduced statement by Christian75, "without formation of significant amounts of dimethylsulfide as a side product". It is without question that, as outlined in the mechanism, dimethylsulfide is generated. Maybe the confusion stems from reference [2], in which it is stated: "A by-product, the methyl thiomethyl ether derivative of alcohol, which often arises significantly in the oxidation with acetic anhydride-DMSO, is negligible." This refers to a (undesired) by-product of the alcohol oxidation, which is also explained at the end of the Organic Chemistry Portal: Swern Oxidation article: "If the temperature is not kept near -78°C, mixed thioacetals may result". It is these mixed thioacetals ("methyl thiomethylethers") that Parikh and Doering refer to in [2], not dimethylsulfide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.120.42 (talk) 11:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]