Talk:Paratonia

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Paratonia is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

MEDRS

the first seven references do not comply w/ MEDRS, as for the others I don't have access to determine but a few--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I read the guidelines for references and citations, unfortunately there are no secondary sources available, I believe this is the best we can write about paratonia Luciomarinelli (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine)#Books...therefore [1]from [2]--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As for guidelines on books, I believe that current first two references (Dupré and Kral) should remain for historical perspective. The two books you cite above report incomplete and outdated definitions of pararatonia, by completely ignoring facilitatory paratonia Luciomarinelli (talk) 18:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[3]the second link, indicates all books that are available(and more) if you go to next page[4](even if you feel the first link/book[5] I indicated was not satisfactory, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I added a recent book among those you suggested. Luciomarinelli (talk) 12:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]