Talk:Parareptilia
Appearance
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Molecular genetics
[edit]Nowadays we have molecular genetics. Therefore I do not understand why the relationship between the various sorts of amniotes is still that unclear. According to me, fossiles are no longer needed.--80.141.191.65 (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Anapsida vs. Parareptilia
[edit]Parareptilia Olson, 1947, is the preferred name. Check out the following paper regarding Parareptilia (or Anapsida) phylogeny.
Linda A. Tsuji and Johannes Müller. 2010. Assembling the history of the Parareptilia: phylogeny, diversification, and a new definition of the clade. Fossil Record, 12(1): 71-81.Ronald Van Heest (talk) 23:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- Start-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles