Talk:Paraprotopteryx
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paraprotopteryx article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Paleontology speak
[edit]Don't know if this is the right word, but may I suggest the article is not just a string of technically correct terms made into links, so that it can make sense in the English language and free up the prose for browsing the article? In other words, a little more description helps rather than hurts and does not diminish the article the links refer to at all. A good example of improvement is when you put (wishbone) after the scientific term, more of this please. Makes a scientific article more engaging for readers. : ) Julia Rossi (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK, I'm working on it. I'm just trying not to introduce any WP:OR. Vultur (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)