Talk:Paradox Valley
A fact from Paradox Valley appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 January 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Name
[edit]I would greatly appreciate any information on how the valley acquired its unusual name. Paradoctor (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Paradox Valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091207010647/http://www.southern-ute.nsn.us/history/index.html to http://www.southern-ute.nsn.us/history/index.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rmag.org/rmag_uploads/outcrops/0302.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Unnecessary advertisement in photo caption
[edit]Hello - I'm not a frequent Wikipedia user and I don't want to mess around without proper permission, so forgive me if this is out of line, but there seems to be some kind of advertisement embedded in this article that I don't think belongs here. Clicking on the photo of Paradox Valley reveals a caption that inexplicably plugs a 1977 novel? It seems very out of place, given the novel isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article. I wanted to bring it to somebody's attention, if it's a problem at all. 2601:246:C180:CDF0:4CC8:1B6A:33D4:7DBB (talk) 03:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- You are correct, that was an embedded
spamexternal link, glad you noticed it. I've edited the photo description on Commons, and that seemed to take care of the problem. Netherzone (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)- I don't think that was intentional spam; it was added by the Commons reviewer who checked the Flickr license. I'm guessing they were just using a script that automagically copies the caption from Flickr. Either way, thanks for removing it. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification and checking into this! I've struck my comment calling it spam above. Netherzone (talk) 22:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think that was intentional spam; it was added by the Commons reviewer who checked the Flickr license. I'm guessing they were just using a script that automagically copies the caption from Flickr. Either way, thanks for removing it. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)