Talk:Para-Scientology
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Para-Scientology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notable
[edit]The article starts out by saying Para-Scientology is a branch of Scientology. This does not seem to be supported by the article. It seems to be just an expression that Hubbard used sometimes. This also seems to be the opinion of critics. Steve Dufour 12:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Para-Scientology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060112193301/http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/kent-fake-religion.htm to http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/kent-fake-religion.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061211201637/http://reportingtimes.com/viewarticle.asp?iArticleID=426 to http://www.reportingtimes.com/viewarticle.asp?iArticleID=426
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Not notable
[edit]I don't think this is a subject, though maybe a definition Hubbard said a time or two. Things Hubbard theorized, he would later mention as fact, and incorporate them into the body of Scientology.... but not this. He also like making up new terms, some of which were shortly discarded. There are three definitions in his tech dictionary, from the mid-1950s. Nothing since then. This could be a paragraph in the Glossary of Scientology with a redirect from here, but this is obscure enough that it will never pass notability requirements for a standalone page in Wikipedia. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 04:39, 16 July 2024 (UTC)