Talk:Paper sons

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Andyavocado. Peer reviewers: Cat Phou, AustinThomson.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

@Andyavocado: Greetings! I think this is off to a pretty solid start!

You've done a lot of research! The references look solid. A more to traditional newspapers or journals might be to helpful to establish the notability of the topic but I think you're off to a good start. As soon as you add a couple more, I think this is probably good to move the article into the main namespace.
You make many statements in the text that are surprising and that really need to be backed up by citations. The whole paragraphs on descendants and how they feel, for example, needs to be cited or removed.
There are many small typos, misspellings, and grammatical issues that should be fixed.

Keep working on it! This is a great start and I'm looking forward to seeing this develop into a great article. —mako ๛ 19:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Andyavocado: Of all the articles I've seen throughout the class, yours is one of most detailed I've seen, awesome job! You have really solid references from a variety of reliable sources. The topic is also a really interesting and I'm surprised there wasn't already and article on it. Overall, great job, there are just a few grammar and spelling mistakes that I have gone through and fixed. You should definitely take a second look and correct any additional mistakes. Once you have done that I think you have an amazing article, great job! AustinThomson (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)AustinThomson[reply]

Ethical consideration about notable individuals

I have some concerns regarding if it is ethical for us to add notable individuals on this Wikipedia page considering that this information without proper explanation about their specific stories and citations for articles might result in potential harm to these individuals, creating opportunities for potential hate speech in and out of the realm of Wikipedia entry. When citing notable individuals should we seek confirmation and consent from these individuals first? Is this section really necessary and what kind of nuance do they add to the entry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicolaus (talk • contribs) 01:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]