Talk:Panthera hybrid

Cats High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an audio file(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.

Mammals Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an audio file(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.

Molecular Biology: Genetics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Evolutionary biology Low‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lion-tiger hybrids was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Panthera hybrid. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Jaguar-tiger hole

Why is there a gap where Jaguar♂ and Tiger♀ cross? Because for some obscure reason nobody's thought of a name? Let's think of one now! How about "jagger"? -- Smjg 10:49, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea. Probably a result of some incompatability; although that didn't stop some hybrids from being on the list. --Apostrophe 19:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguars and tigers have not been hybridised. This page refers for reported hybrids, not hypothetical hybrids. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.133.0.8 (talk) 15:13, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the hybrid exists, it's an ugly hole in the structure of the page and one that should be addressed. I see someone's addressed it now. But to say

"There are no known successful attempts in the mating of these species"

still begs the question: known by whom? -- Smjg (talk) 01:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Known in the published scientific literature? --Cubbi (talk) 14:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parental species

One of the reasons why they only exist in captivity because the territories of the parental species do not overlap in the wild. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:2D30:B947:2905:66BA:FFC1 (talk) 00:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dogula

In the body of this section, it is spelt Dogla. Which is correct?

Dogla. I apologize for the misspelling. --Apostrophe 18:09, 31 August 2005 (UTC)`[reply]

Dogla

In Suriname the word "dogla" refers (originally) to a person with Indian and Creole parents, Afro-Indian basically. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.250.166.160 (talk) 23:02, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Panthers?

How about regular panthers? Do they go in to any of this? Valley2city 06:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A panther is not an actualy animal. It is one of the classification groups in taxonomy, specifically a genus. The genus is called Panthera, and in it includes the 4 big cats: Lions, Tigers, Leopards, and Jaguars. More specifically, a lot jaguars and leopards are incorrectly refered to as panthers. There is, though, a melanistic(a deformaty in fur color, like albino) that makes the leopards all black, and these are called Black Panthers.

In other words, the term panther is often missused. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.117.137.33 (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neologisms

Don't make up names, especially for hypothetical creatures. If these hybrids really are referred to using these portmanteau names, cite a source. A few are real, but I suspect most are probably made up. --Alivemajor 21:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah quit using these childish names made up by the popular media in an attempt to be funny about one of their 'peculiar' newsitems.--194.81.255.254 08:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tigons are not smaller?

Quote: "Unlike popular belief, Tigons are not smaller because of combining genetics." – I think this sentence contains two statements: 1. Tigons are not smaller; 2. The cause is genetics. – Now which statement is "unlike popular belief"? Are they not smaller? Or are they smaller indeed, but just not due to genetics? --Suaheli (talk) 06:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fertility

Are any of the hybrids mentioned fertile? It's my understanding that Tigons and Ligers are sterile like Mules and Hinnies. If sterile, they wouldn't constitute a new species and would be curiosities but evolutionary deadends. Virgil H. Soule (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The newest source states that female hybrids are not sterile http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19633192 Matt Zero (talk) 11:15, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lipard incorrect information

I have actually spoken to Dr. Gerhard Heindl, Historical Research & Documentation, at Schoenbrunn Zoo and he has told me that the zoo never had a Lipard, at least not after 1945. He stated the following:

"I had a look at the in principle very interesting page and there found a citation of Otto Antonius from 1951. As we are occupied with a book about Antonius at the moment, this was a kind of quest for me.

Two things are to tell in this case: Antonius already died in 1945, so his article was published posthumous. That’s a first reason why the mentioned animal could not have lived in 1951. A second one that in my opinion locates the mentioned not in Schoenbrunn Zoo is what Antonius wrote: “Mischlinge von einander ferne stehenden Arten, wie Löwe x Leopard, Löwe x Puma, wurden erzielt, aber nicht von mir beobachtet …”, that means: “Hybrids from species which are relatively afar like leopard x lion or lion x puma were achieved, but have not been seen by me”.

So should a hybrid lion/leopard ever have existed in Schoenbrunn Zoo it must have been up to 1945, and Antonius must have had known of it – he therefore would have named Schoenbrunn Zoo. Moreover Antonius refers in this article about hybrids in general not only such of Schoenbrunn Zoo. He also mentions animals he had seen in other zoos. According to the fact that we also don’t have records, traditions or articles about such an animal I think Antonius has been misinterpreted by the authors of........He read or heard somewhere about a hybrid lion/leopard and told about it in his article without referring to his source."

I think the content should be removedDistant smile (talk) 15:04, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big cat/Domestic cat

Is there any evidence/research into the possibility of a Big cat/domestic cat hybrid? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypershock (talk • contribs) 00:22, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scrabble

Does anyone know if these hybrid names of are official words and therefore allowed in scrabble? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.101.42 (talk) 12:52, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course these hybrids are official words. Gug01 (talk) 20:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Proposing merge from Lion-tiger hybrids to Panthera hybrid

Merge - This was brought up at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion-tiger hybrids. Though both Lion-tiger hybrids and Panthera hybrid are of decent length, there are reference problems that could be relieved by merging. I don't think lion-tiger hybrids are notable enough on their own that we need a separate article, and most readers would benefit from having all the information on one page. --Nessie (talk) 15:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Let the discussion occur at the AfD page to avoid splitting the conversation. I will remove the merge tags for now, but if the AfD closes as keep feel free to start another merger proposal.

Can't find any evidence that anyone uses the 2nd, 3rd, 4th hybrid names

All sources associated with the 2-4th hybrids seem suspicious or link back to wikipedia. The original source also seems to be a kid editing this page like 5 years ago. I'm going to delete it for now, but if anyone wants to challenge, we can add it back. Thanks --Majora'sMacro (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taliger

'Taliger' redirects here, but is not mentioned anywhere on the page. What is a Taliger? Walkersam (talk) 00:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cross between a male tiger and a liger (female lion-tiger hybrid). There are also s Liligers, TiLigers, WaLiligers. But see here. Seems to be a one man operation that can be considered animal abuse. I don't think there is much value in adding these made up names for a few crosses of no notability. Perhaps delete the redirect as promotional. — Jts1882 | talk 07:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I love the table

I love the "Table of names for hybrids"

i will add all the hybrids as parents as well

Could we make it into a {{hybrid-table}}???

>>> Webclouddat (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reverted

I reverted an edit, as that information does not go there in the wiki page. Here is the whole part i removed:

"

(I deleted the part about infertility because its completely false they are genetically viable the issue lies in them actually finding a mate seeing as they are generally not found in the wild and are generally intentionally breed by humans in a zoo but by all means that doesn't mean they couldn't It's a completely understudied topic because male hybrids like ligers are far to big to physically breed with other panthers and not cause damage during the attempted also no one has actually attempted to artificially inseminate another panther with male liger semen or any male panther hybrid semen for that matter.)=source(https://bigcatrescue.org/liger-facts/) they say big cat artificial insemination is impossible in this source but i call bullshit because the next source contradicts it it's not impossible it's just really hard to do( https://www.pdza.org/ai-for-tigers/#:~:text=But%20it%20is%20a%20big,four%20litters%20have%20been%20born.)

"

Do note, this edit was by an IP user, not a logged in user, but as the information is there and good, i assume good faith

_>>> Webclo^udd@their-talk-page 21:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]