Talk:Pantelion Films

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

The significance of the studio has been beefed up. The studio is followed closely by Variety, New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Fast Company, etc. etc. so is obviously a major bellweather of change re: Latino film going audiences in the United States. The entry lists firsts, award-winning film, innovative business model never tried before in the U.S. vis a vis Hispanic films, company is tracked by the trade press and mainstream press. Of course, I cited multiple first-class sources such as Variety, NY Times, Fast Company, et al. I understand if there is racism and only white Hollywood studios are considered significant to Wikipedia but that needs to be stated expressly. I see many white studios which are not flagged on Wikipedia, have really no major significance offered like this entry, and remain to this day. Further, there are at least a half dozen Pantelion link pages that go nowhere without this entry. We study Pantelion at Southern Methodist University and it seems odd that this studio, in particular, would not be allowed within Wikipedia. Thanks much for reconsideration. Dsedman (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]