Talk:Pantaleon

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Greece

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi PHG!

Bopearachchi does not claim that Pantaleon ruled in Arachosia and Gandhara only. He gives a double-edged arrow between Pantaleon and Agathocles on the table on p453, probably indicating that the two kings ruled the same kingdom of Bactria and India (they share some mintmarks, as you know).

Bopearachchi also credits Pantaleon as the first king to rule in India, based on the fact that Demetrius I never struck Indian coins. This is a numismatician's view and its weaknesses are obvious to me: striking coins and conquering are two different things. Demetrios I well may have conquered India without striking coins there; so did Alexander. The Indian minting crafts were much inferior to the Greek, and to me it's perfectly plausible that Demetrius simply sent metal hoards home to his own state-of-the-art mints in Bactria, to strike unilingual coins to pay his soldiers. Pantaleon on the other hand may have had reasons to appeal to the Indian population if he wanted their support against other Greek kings. His Indian coins do not seem the work of a conqerour but of a governor trying to widen his base of support.

Also, Bopearachchi bases his chronology on a mistake; he believes that Euthydemus I ruled from 230 BCE. This date should rather be c.222 BCE as is shown in The Impact of Seleucid Decline on the Eastern Iranian Plateau: The Foundations of Arsacid Parthia and Graeco-Bactria by Jeffrey D. Lerner. Therefore Bopearachchi's approximative end date for Euthydemus I (200 BCE) - which is probably chosen to fix a reasonable limitation of 30 years to his reign - is challenged. Euthydemus may well have reigned until 195 BCE, which alters the reign of Demetrius I and thus, domino-style, all the later kings until Eucratides, whose reign as you know could be roughly estimated from other sources. Best Regards - as usual I appreciate your suggestions! --Sponsianus 20:02, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

File:PantaleonLion.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:PantaleonLion.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]