Talk:Panorama (typesetting software)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer graphics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Hi Ivansanchez,

I am new to Wikipedia, can you please be more specific on what you found out as promotional material. I'll surely try to fix this as soon as I get your inputs. ForedIndia 10:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content Edited

Removed the promotional/marketting words from the article. Edited content to present a neutral view. ForedIndia 10:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the article is that it only has links to the product (or company's) webpage. Also, features of a particular product are of no interest for an encyclopedia. Has this product affected the society? Has it got reviews in magazines? IMHO, the aricle still has a lot of redundant information.

Please have a look at WP:V: any information for an article should come from third sources, not from the company itself (that's called a "self-published source", and is not acceptable). Have a look at WP:COI too. Regards, -- Iván Sánchez ^(talk) 10:33, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for you inputs. I have some links for some third party references and some magazine reviews. I'll edit the content and revert back to you. Thanks and best regards,ForedIndia 10:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, remember to cite the third parties properly - have a look at WP:CITE. -- Iván Sánchez ^(talk) 10:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cited more third party external links as well as references.ForedIndia 08:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Panorama Rendering Complex Languages.png

Image:Panorama Rendering Complex Languages.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Panorama (Layout Engine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001005528/http://sec.edgar-online.com/2005/03/29/0001193125-05-063465/Section2.asp to http://sec.edgar-online.com/2005/03/29/0001193125-05-063465/Section2.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]