Talk:Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Objection to proposed deletion

This camera is notable for being one of the few cameras in the Four Thirds System, and is linked to from that page. If this article is deleted then it will no longer be possible to have a comprehensive list of all of the Four Thirds System cameras. It may well be a rather commercial argument, but the Four Thirds System is somewhat controversial and noteworthy as being a semi-non-proprietary system, as opposed to all the other proprietary systems from Canon, Nikon, Pentax, etc.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 can also be considered noteworthy as an indication that Panasonic intends to stick it out with the Four Thirds System, also because they announced new lenses for the Four Thirds System along with this camera.

If it's absolutely necessary, I could probably flesh out the article somewhat, but I don't really have the time. --RenniePet (talk) 23:50, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted the article for AfD. -- Mikeblas (talk) 03:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not flag for deletion if possible, flag for improvements required, this article is like a placeholder for further contributions kchanyr 03:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kchanyr (talk • contribs)

Flagging the article won't improve the notability of the subject. -- Mikeblas (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does it share components with the Olympus E-410/510?

Quote: " ... and contains some basic parts provided by Olympus." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.43.176 (talk) 14:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where this definite info comes from? Simon Joinson 'suspects' the L-10 and E-410/510 share mirror box and sensor'. Quote: "Like the L1 the new model is the fruit of the partnership between Panasonic and Olympus, and once again it features a Live MOS sensor and SSWF dust removal filter, (we don't have definite information yet, but the mirror box and sensor are, we suspect the same as the E-410)." http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmcl10/

I bring it up as I think people may be thinking that as the Panasonic L-1 shared bits with an Olympus model, that so must this body. I'd also thought that the l-10 had a different 10MP LMOS sensor than the Olympus E-3 or the E-x10 bodies?

... and I'm not even going near the 'low-pass' filter! ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.43.176 (talk) 14:19, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]