Talk:PanARMENIAN.Net

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Armenia

	PanARMENIAN.Net is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Everyone needs to know"?

Hello. I saw the following statement, and it's bad-written for Wikipedia:

"99" book dedicated to Armenian Genocide, 2014. Contains all important facts about the 1915 events everyone needs to know.

"Everyone needs to know" is something highly difficult to prove. There are 7.3 billion humans on Earth, and I don't know how could some researcher check every one of those persons. Also, it would be necessary to prove every one of those NEED to know about the genocide that happened. Who judges what is needed or not? What is to NEED? If it was "everyone should know", it would be easier to accept, but needing is more difficult to prove/accept. Also, if it was said "everyone should know", this affirmation would be an opinion and should be attributed to someone who said... Who said?

The citations to this claim are: the book itself (primary source, not reliable) and an 404 Error page. So, I think that the sentence should be removed or re-written.--200.223.199.146 (talk) 11:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]