Talk:Pan-Caucasianism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pan-Caucasianism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Russia: History / Demographics & ethnography / Chechnya Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the demographics and ethnography of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Chechnya task force.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Did someone make this up?

This whole article read like a collection of seemingly unrelated facts that someone tried very hard to tie into this vague "Pan-Caucasianism" idea, which is not clear what it even is. Gamsakhurdia wanted regional alliance, so that means he wanted a unified state? Regional cooperation means all countries should be unified? Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic exist less than two months and it seems mostly for practical reasons, but it is used as evidence for Pan-Caucasianism. Not clear if those people even knew what Pan-Caucasianism is. Russian version of this article is recommended for deletion, so I would do same here. LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 01:43, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did more search and apparently "Pan-Caucasianism" is also some kind of white supremacist solidary concept, unrelated to Caucasus. One more indication that people who write this don't know what it is they write.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 01:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AGF before making such comments that "people who write this don't know what it is they write", first of all. Secondly, there are several cited sources which mention Pan-Caucasianism directly by name, so this is hardly a "collection of seemingly unrelated facts", as you claim.

Mupper-san (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that Kingdom of Georgia, TDFR, or TSFSR are part of "Pan-Caucasian" ideology or project just because they happened to unite Caucasus territory. Modern concept is being stretched to applied to different eras which is very questionable and is where original research comes in.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again someone remove the tag but references did not clear up everything. Kingdom of Georgia was not part of pan-Caucasian ideology, which is modern development, not medeival. Also, source cited by Lakoba mention pan-Caucasian only once, only saying it "coincided" with one of the local states. "Coincide" is not same as being part of some knid of pan-Caucasian project. You should explain this here, not by repeatedly removing tag.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 17:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you are basing your comments here, and your edits to the article, on what you think you know rather than on what reliable sources write. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where, for example, in reliable source does it say that Kingdom of Georgia was pan-Caucasian project? The only citation I see is Stephen Rapp and there he uses "pan-Caucasian" in strictly territorial sense. Kingdom of Georgia was not about cooperation or integration with neighbors, as in this 20th century ideology - it was just a kingdom that happen to cover all Caucasus. It is not correct to stretch modern ideology to apply to middle ages retroactively.--LeontinaVarlamonva (talk) 00:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

@Silveresc and @LeontinaVarlamonva, please both stop your disruptive editing such as removing sources without justification besides the name being distasteful to you, removing content which is cited in the body, or marking the page as OR or PROD when numerous sources are used within the article that refer to Pan-Caucasianism by name. If this continues, I will be left with no choice but to bring the matter up at WP:ANB due to the level of disruption.

Mupper-san (talk) 08:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]