Talk:Pamunkey

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Virginia may be able to help!

Comment

You've got to be kidding... the Pamunkey tribe has existed for 10-12 thousand years?? Thats most of the time that humans have even been in the Americas. The Pamunkey's ancestors were here that long and probably more, but I very much doubt that as a self-recognized Pamunkey nation they existed anywhere near that long. Murple 16:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I will be removing the photo of Mr. Krigsvold as it adds nothing to the article. Perhaps consider adding a tribal member in traditional garb?68.194.111.216 22:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV and tone

The article reads in part like a school paper, and wanders too much in its approach. Needs to be reworked to be more succinct, or better identify historic sections and relation to current members of the tribe. It also seems one-sided. At the very least, it needs sourcing of unsupported statements.--Parkwells (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recently added a lot of information to this article as well as added citations where they were needed for things already in the article, if I could find them. I'm sure it might still need some copy editing, which I have not done much of yet. I figure another set of eyes may be best for that anyway. In my additions and edits I have tried to make the article more neutral as well. I'm sure the article still needs some improvement, but the tag about neutrality may be able to be removed at this point, though I will not do so myself.Sarah1607 (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good additions; it's much more thorough now.--Parkwells (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I noticed there were a lot of issues with the article so I made it a project to add to it and do a major clean up. And then I figured I'd rely on others to make things more concise and add or clean up more. Thanks for making what I added more concise, I know I can be too wordy at times. I think the article looks even better now.Sarah1607 (talk) 02:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page is biased

The Pamunkey's history is important because of thier interaction with the colonists only in the context of a colonial history course. Their history is important because it contributes to our understanding of the world, the way any other history does. What if I want to know about the Pamunkey's before the colonists ever arrived? Is that not "important?" Please get rid of the eurocentricity. It's too much.

APenniman (talk) 17:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)APenniman[reply]

Then we have to either go to Virginia and ask them which would be called WP:OR and excluded from the encyclopedia, or find an archeological paper about them. i.e. diggs at Werowocomoco The ancient Capital of the Powhatan (A polity which was populated by the Pamunkey + a number of others.)--71.239.120.235 (talk) 21:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't find such issues in the current version. Can someone that has the above concerns of APenniman or APenniman themselves make an assessment of the article at its current state? It seems to me that the article very broadly covers its subject. --Divide et Impera (talk) 14:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pamunkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150704210242/http://bigstory.ap.org:80/article/780fecad448e4a9f9f2d196eaa37f0d6/virginias-pamunkey-indian-tribe-granted-federal-recognition to http://bigstory.ap.org/article/780fecad448e4a9f9f2d196eaa37f0d6/virginias-pamunkey-indian-tribe-granted-federal-recognition

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pamunkey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

did pocahontas live in the pamunkey tribe ??

Last edited at 10:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 02:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pamunkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224023658/http://indians.vipnet.org/resources/writersGuide.pdf to http://indians.vipnet.org/resources/writersGuide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

To add to this article: mention of the Pamunkey's role in the naming of 486958 Arrokoth. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:34, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bad grammar

"For example, during the late 1800s John Howell as trying to build an Indian only school for Pamunkeys living in New Kent. " Should "as" be "saw" or "was"? And shouldn't it be "Indian-only"(i.e., with a hyphen)? Kdammers (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]