Jump to content

Talk:Pamella Bordes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of hoax image

[edit]

The image doesn't pertain to Pamela as can be seen from Private_Eye#Andrew_Neil_image and its source/reference. For further confirmation, look at the actual image of Pamela Bordes on the HT feature. --Gurubrahma 10:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube

[edit]

Youtube is not a source any more than a printer is a source, it is simply the means of hosting. Far more 'important' pages routinely use videos hosted by youtube - a notable example is the page on the US 2008 election that lists at least two sources hosted on youtube (#24, #26), there was also a minor discussion on netflix usage on reliable sources where its inclusion didn't stir any objection (#29) - as the discussion noted the reliability of the source is most important, not necesarrily its ease of access (after all rare books aren't easily accessible) nor in addition the method in which its data is stored or hosted.Zaq12wsx (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic surgery for moped or acid attack

[edit]

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/specials/proj_tabloid/pamelafeature1.shtml HT says her dangerous liasons led to acid attack? Who what why? Any one has info on it? Or is that a hoax? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sannuki (talkcontribs) 06:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

[edit]

{{Request edit}} Capitalize father's name in personal history section. 117.227.30.10 (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--GoPTCN 15:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest edit: Under "Allegations", the verb "dating" seems a strange one in the context of her job. I would propose "having simultaneous relationships with".

Shameful, cowardly article.

[edit]

You have bowdlerised and minimised the important part. The rest is PR. Shame on you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.78.161.224 (talk) 03:28, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete

[edit]

This article is missing the most notable aspect of this persons fame/infamy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.218.58 (talk) 10:05, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree, seems this article is edited by somebody close to her as it is made to look like her photography career is far more notable to her scandal in 1989 when its the opposite; her photography career is not why she has a Wikipedia article. Donnie Park (talk) 13:47, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's there in the first sentence, with sources.Martinlc (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pamella Bordes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]