Talk:Pamela Ribon

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mike

This is F-list notable. Personally, I think this should be deleted. Mike H. That's hot 10:00, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Mike

This chick totally wrote her own stub. She is only known for being made fun of on Television Without Pity. If she is notable, then you'll have to start writing stubs for all of my daily dumps as well. I guess under "W" for "Wendy's bowel movements." Get crackin'! - Wendy W.

Disagree with these two doofuses

If Pamela is such an "F-lister" and someone not worth of an entry on this site, what are you two doing here at her entry???? You are just two of the many people interested in her work. She's written books and screenplays, writes for television, and is a "pioneer" in the blogging world. So flush that one down, Wendy!

Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Read them both and adhere to them, please. Thank you. Mike H. That's hot 07:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unoffensive Definition from Wikipedia

doofus (plural: doofuses)--

(slang) A person with poor judgment and taste

And we have poor judgment and taste why? Because we disagree with you? Mike H. That's hot 07:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just sayin'...

For your edification, the point of my first entry:

1.) It's pretty funny that someone you consider an "F-lister" or someone you deem not worthy of any entry is someone you took the time to look up in the first place. Just commenting on the "doofy" logic of it. That's it! Nothing to get your bloomers in a twirl about.

The point of my second entry:

2.) The term doofus is quite tame: It does not break any laws of "civilty" and was not meant to "attack you personally"; I included the dictionary defintion to illustrate this very point. If you were interested in calling out people for personal attacks, wouldn't it have made more sense to do so with Wendy's, which referenced "bowel movements" and "dumps" with regard to Ms. Ribon?

Excrement Aside, No Need For Deletion

I added sections on her personal site and the ensuing book drives she's sponsored for the past 4 years.

Pamie may be mostly an "Internet celebrity", but she's a published author offline as well, and has enough notable "stuff" about her to at least warrant an article. I'm not exactly sure what version of TWoP Wendy is reading, but (although everyone on that site reserves the right to mock everyone else, since mockery and fun-making are its stock in trade) her work is well-respected by her peers. Strong Bad isn't necessarily an A-list Internet celebrity, but he's notable enough to have an entry. So is Pamie. --07:52, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Still married?

Are Pamie and Stee still married? The entry sort of implies that they still are, but neither of them has really mentioned the other in a long time. 76.124.109.31 (talk) 06:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The NPOV tag

Putting aside the discussions of notable, I added the POV tag to the article. It reads too much as promotional to me and has other issues. She's listed as being a "best-selling" author but yet all but one of her books listed under the Bibliography are red linked. Her blog is referenced and linked to a couple of times with a mention of the "large readership" but yet I have a blog that I haven't updated in over 5 years with a higher ranking than her. She may call herself the "Pop Culture Princess" but I don't see any mention of it elsewhere. Many of the edits have also been done by anonymous IP addresses as well. --98.24.99.70 (talk) 11:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stubyfying

Recently all text in this article was deleted ("Stubyfied") because of "multiple issues". Doesn't seem like a very elegant solution to me, or, for that matter, very kind to the people who tried to add content to the article. I propose to revert the stubification, but i'd like a second opinion. PizzaMan (♨♨) 18:42, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I boldly restored some parts of the mass deletion. PizzaMan (♨♨) 19:47, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

everything in a BLP article needs to be well-sourced. that material you restored was not. re-deleted. Jytdog (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The intention of that policy is to not offend living persons. When looking for references for her age, i found on her Facebook page a comment that said something like "now even my Facebook page is being questioned". So she obviously didn't appreciate the blp policy "protecting" her here. Either way someone should just look for some sources. PizzaMan (♨♨) 08:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]