Talk:Palmerston (cat)

Cats Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cat or politician

Isn't whether Palmerston is a politician up to the UK government, not us?--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When it runs for election, it's a politician... until then, it's a cat. To the new WP:SPA: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS isn't a justification for inclusion here. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is seriously becoming a candidate for WP:HALLOFLAME. It's a cat. Calling "chief mouser" a political role with a straight face deserves a Trouting at the very least. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad we have people here to correct the UK government; they might have thought they were a sovereign nation with the right to create and fill political positions as they saw fit. Are you sure as long as Wikipedia is explaining things to the British government, we shouldn't start with explaining that a monarchy involves a monarch with power over the nation?--Prosfilaes (talk) 10:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cat. One that lives in a constitutional monarchy, so not all that much power really. But hey, blue passports! Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Prosfilaes: You've been using this same, "How dare you presume to 'correct' the mighty and sovereign Her Majesty's Government!" argument for a while now. Please provide one source that shows that Her Majesty's Government provides Palmerston with a budget, or a staff, or an office, or an organization chart, or any of the indica of an actual government position. You won't be able to, I'm fairly certain, because "chief mouser" is not an actual government position; it's a transparent PR move. We are allowed to apply a reasonable minimum of our critical thinking to government claims. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And you've been ignoring it for a while now. I don't think we are allowed to apply critical thinking to things that are so sharply under a government's power; a government may create and destroy official government positions and fill them at will. There's a whole set of government positions called sinecures that don't have "a budget, or a staff, or an office, or an organization chart" by definition.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Cat May Look at a Queen :) -just not be a Permenent Undersecretary. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 17:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caligula would disagree.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leader

Good article, it's nice to see not everyone on Wikipedia is po-faced. But since Palmerston is the FCO cat rather than naming the PM in the infobox, shouldn't it be the Foreign Secretary? And, linked, what is meant by BoJo being "leader". If that is true now, it clearly wasn't when Palmerston got the job. Should there at least be a list rather than just the current "leader"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.242.136 (talk) 15:38, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Palmerston 20170714.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link

Isn't the link to chief mouser incorrect? It links to the cabinet office role, whereas that is not the position, it is chief mouser to the FCO for Palmerston. Ginister (talk) 12:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]