Talk:Palmela
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the actual "mayor's" name is not relevant to describe the village of Palmela because one time is some person, another time is another, so I consider it non-relevant! There are other important subjects that should be mentioned here... I also think that AutoEuropa (the plant) should have a page of it's own and should not be described in this section.. There could be here a link to Autoeuropa's section... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.90.193.230 (talk) 21:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
The mayor's name is always relevant and you'll notice that it is present in any town or city's article. This is an encyclopedia. Your particular grudge against a politician is non-relevant. 83.240.239.233 (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Palmela. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140929112522/http://www.dgterritorio.pt/ficheiros/cadastro/caop/caop_download/caop_2014_0/areasfregmundistcaop2014_2 to http://www.dgterritorio.pt/ficheiros/cadastro/caop/caop_download/caop_2014_0/areasfregmundistcaop2014_2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)