Talk:Paliwal

Anthroponymy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

article formated unnecessary information removed Indicom217 (talk)indicom217 Akhil Kumar Singh Paliwal S/O Anil Kumar Singh Paliwal S/O Ram Charan Singh Paliwal Belonging To Village-Fatehpur (Manikpur) Post - Saidahe Distic- Ambedkar Nagar State - Uttar Pradesh a Varry Well Educated Family In Fatehpur Village — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.133.178 (talk) 10:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vaibhav Dwivedi

he is a software engg completed his school from Gurukul Public School 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thevaibhav2221 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Current Version

Hi ! Ekdalian , In this current version of the article the sources which are used to mentions them as a sub caste of Kanyakubja Brahmins are not valid because :

1. First source used in this is not reliable because the current source is a reprint of Raj Era sources you can check from here : People of India

2. Second sources used is not reliable according to this , because the book is using the same Raj Era and AnSI as their reference.

3. And the 3rd and 4th sources does not mention anything about Paliwals when you search in both the 3rd & 4th in google books.

Now you can check the below sources :

This article by Times of India in which Paliwal Sabha clearly mentions that they were Gaurs Brahmins not Kanyakubjas.
Also another book by the R.K Dave clearly mentions this that Paliwals include themselves in Gaurs , see the source
Similarly , same thing mentioned by archaeologist Rima Hooja in her book A history of Rajasthan see the source

Current sources using this book : Kanyakubja Vanshavali as the base which was also used by britishers but its unreliable according to Wikipedia rules as these kind of vanshawlis were written for the praise of their own community. Now in this vanshwali , Bhumihars are also mentioned as Brahmins but they are not Brahmins see this comment of Sitush in this summary. This vanshavli also mentions Sarupareen as there subcaste but in the counter of this book , Saryupareens printed their own vanshawli declaring themselves different community than Kanyakubjas Saryupain Vanshavali in this book they discard the claim of being a subcaste of Kanyakubja. Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Ekdalian I want you to look at the sources in this consensus by @Manoj Singh Gaur

His source [source1] Nowhere mentions Gaur Brahmins but Ad-Gaurs which is different, Same with his another [source2] which doesn't mentions Gaur Brahmins.

Secondly None of my source takes reference from any Vanshaavali as pointed out by @Manoj Singh Gaur. You can check it by yourself. He is trying to fool the editors by merging two different castes Gaur brahmin and Ad-Gaurs as one.

Coming towards my sources [First], It nowhere cites any British Raj sources or any other Vanshavali. Also as Per WP:RAJ Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya can't be said as unreliable as he isn't British civil servant. Check it all by your own and not as per the sock @Manoj Kumar Gaur Banabhatta I (talk) 10:48, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gaur/Ad Gaurs/Adi Gaurs all are the same thing. Have you any knowledge ? how naming works ? Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 10:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to your point , check below what is written in the article by TOI :

According to Akhil Bhartiya Paliwal Samaj secretary Rishidutt Paliwal, earlier Paliwal Brahmins were known as ‘Gaur’ Brahmins, but later while residing in Pali, they became Paliwal Brahmins.

Also the current version does not mention any caste. Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't same. Check sources here. [Source 1] [source 2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banabhatta I (talk • contribs) 11:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you dumb ? The current version by AnSi is not reliable according to People of India Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 11:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your second source mentions clearly that Gaur/Adi Gaur/Sanadhya they all are synonmous. Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Manoj Singh Gaur where? Cite page number Banabhatta I (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already added the source although you area a dumb fellow I am adding the page no for you : p-no 1284

btw thanks for this source. Manoj Singh Gaur (talk) 11:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]