Talk:Painlevé paradox
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
‹See TfM›
|
Untitled
[edit]In its present form, this article is more of a historical note and an attribution to various contributors of the field. However, it does not contain much (if any) technical content and it does not explain or elaborate on the paradox. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eitangrinspun (talk • contribs) 20:00, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
This article doesn't explain what the Painlevé paradox actually is! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.12.228.67 (talk) 22:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
The article doesn't make sense and is all over the place. --Ec20flat (talk) 15:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)