Talk:Paige Davis

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

United States: Louisville

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Low-importance).

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Gameshow Marathon

Rather than update the Gameshow Marathon results, I decided to just remove the results and leave the link to the show's article. People who really want to know the results can see them there.

Marriage

She married a Mr Page - this presumably now makes her Paige Page..... - ChrisTheDude 09:48, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

She has chosen to keep her Maiden name to keep that from happening. --Hourick 04:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad, I could have started a website called "The Paige Page Page."--Kento 12:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On the Trading Spaces set, they referred to her as MPDP. I need to find a reference for that. -- mikehillwig 21:16 18 jan 2007. —Preceding comment was added at 02:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of current work.

Added current work, but will eventually need an expansion once she starts working more. --Hourick 04:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

At the level of precedent, it's not a good thing to have well-sourced material relevant to a public figure's public conduct, along with potential or claimed impact on that figure's career, removed, along with (dubious) legal threats. User Carrystory deleted material relating to Paige Davis' conduct at the Broadway AIDS benefit, although each item was sourced to publications of wide distribution, and counterclaims were also duly given.

Now, I have no interest in the subject of Paige Davis (I wouldn't have known who she was if I hadn't random-surfed the article), but this is very bad wikipractice. The section deleted in mid-July should, I think, be restored for the integrity of the article. At the very least, there should be discussion as to how the deleted material relates to Wikipedia policies on the biographies of living persons. Should the deleted material be restored? DavidOaks (talk) 15:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)DavidOaks (talk) 03:50, 9 January 2008 (UTC)(clarifying edits)[reply]

It's nice to have someone else notice. I have felt all along that the deletion was unjustified, and worked hard to source the material before restoring it the first time, but when the user you mention kept deleting it — with, as you observe, legal claims that are dubious at best given the sourcing — I decided to let it go for the time being rather than get into a personal edit war. Obviously I would favor restoring it. (Besides, her claim that being dismissed was unrelated to the issues mentioned is certainly underscored by the fact that they just announced they're bringing her back to the show. :) Lawikitejana (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC) Update: Restored the section, with some edits, and added more references. Apparently back then I either didn't have the newspaper database access I have now, or I was too unversed in searching it to find all the relevant articles. Found way more than I'm going to add now, and added some other career info, such as cabaret show.Lawikitejana (talk) 03:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Paige Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]