Talk:Paglicci Cave

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of caving and cave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves articles

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

population genetics

The date "BP" is unscientific, because it does not tell wether BP is either an uncalibrated radiocarbon date (which, calibrated by CalPal, would correspond to c. 30,500 ± 500 BC, or simply before present and then correspond to 26,000 BC, which must not simply be conceiled! HJJHolm (talk) 10:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unscientific date given

Again, "28,000 BP (before present)," is nothing. Is it to be raw/uncalibrated 14C before 1950? Should it be calBP = cal before 1950? Or is it popular before today? Or roughly bevore 2000 AD?? HJJHolm (talk) 12:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Correction

The noted Paglicci 33 does not exist. I corrected it to Paglicci 133, beside some stylistic points. The Caramelli results were not confirme in Fu (2016). HJHolm (talk) 07:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]