Talk:Paddy Considine

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

mikejamestaylor (talk) 20:21, 8 August 2008 (UTC) Think this page needs a total re-write as it's being added to ad hoc and the sections are not sufficiently well constructed. Willing to see what others think - if no response, I'll redesign it myself to read better.[reply]

Untitled

at the very least remove the "many sources erroneously quote his year of birth as 1974" bit; I know WP is infamous for inaccuracies but there's no cause to boast when it is correct 77.107.161.113 (talk) 13:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tone

The article as it stands, especially the lede is ridiculously hagiographic and reads like it was written by his agent's PR team. I'm going to start making it more factual, and show not tell. Ashmoo (talk) 10:23, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]