Talk:Pact of Steel/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Given that this article is heavily dependent on references to the low-quality TV documentary "The Road To War" for which the citations don't even reference the relevant point in the documentary which supports the material, I don't see how this can be a GA: the documentary is unlikely to be a reliable source, and the poor quality of the citations means WP:V isn't met. There's a huge and high quality literature of history books, etc, on this topic which should have been used instead. I also note that the "The Pact of Steel – the Pact of Friendship and Alliance between Germany and Italy, May 22, 1939" reference is on someone's Wordpress website, which can't be assumed to be accurate. Nick-D (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As there haven't been any positive changes to the article and given Anotherclown's comments below, I'm delisting the article Nick-D (talk) 10:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delist - In its current state this article probably fails both GA criteria 2b (reliable sources) and 3a (addresses main aspects of the topic). Specifically, it relies heavily on low quality sources and is therefore not reflective of the literature available in the area, while it also seems to be lacking in its coverage of the topic. For instance there seems to be little examination of the motives of either Germany or Italy in entering the pact, other than a very superficial observation of the similarities between Fascism and Nazism. Equally I would have expected a more detailed discussion of the effect of the pact and its results (it was ruinous for Italy for instance). I imagine there would be other areas besides these that would also require examination in depth in order for the article to be considered complete. Anotherclown (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist - Per above. During the discussion as GA and right afterwards, I and another user have been stressing the same weak points of the article, which is little more than a stub, but we have been ignored. Alex2006 (talk) 15:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]