Jump to content

Talk:Chiong murder case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Paco Larrañaga)

/summary This is a barebones summary of the article for use in translation to other languages.Please do not expand. Please feel free to add only important crucial facts.--Jondel 02:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 04:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 04:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


maru (talk) contribs 04:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--Jondel 07:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)The links used to work, now they don't . I guess they should be removed.[reply]

Citizenship

[edit]

Is he Filipino, or otherwise, as his filing under the Foreigners in the Philippines category suggests?

I trust his classification as “Spanish-Filipino” in the opening paragraph answers that.
He has Spanbish citizenship according to the article and the sixth line of this. I^ve read this in other external articles and am sure of this.--Jondel 05:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see. But being a Filipino citizen (Spanish-Filipino) as well, he can’t also be a foreigner.

POV

[edit]

I've tagged this article with the NPOV tag because something doesn't sit quite well: more than half of the article discusses the defense which, upon reading carefully, was made after the judgment has already been finalized by the Philippine Supreme Court. Most of the links are also sympathetic to the defense; it's not that I'm judging the person, but this article's point of view can also be balanced by how the media (local and international) has reported his case. Thanks --- Tito Pao 12:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to post links and other info to balance the article.--Jondel 12:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PBS "Point of View" Documentary

[edit]

Do the primary sources agree on the timeline of various sentences? The PBS "POV" documentary program states that the defendants were initially sentenced to two life terms, and that the death sentence was imposted after the case was review when the sentence was appealed by the prosecution. rhyre (talk) 14:37, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chiong murder case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chiong murder case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiong murder case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chiong murder case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Defense section

[edit]

I came to this article after watching a summary of this case in a Youtube clip, and noticed that the Defense section does not mention that as support of Larrañaga having been at the claimed restaurant, photographes of him at that restaurant were presented as proof of this. These photographes were also displayed in the clip, wherefore they evidently existed, so to speak. I just thought that it might be of value to mention in the article. - Okama-San (talk) 18:46, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An illuminating account

[edit]

The account given here - https://thecasualcriminalist.com/podcasts/the-chiong-sisters-the-most-insane-miscarriage-of-justice/ - contains a lot of context and detail not in this article, and should be a good starting-point for an interested reader to conduct their own research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.195.195 (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]