Talk:Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Influential papers

We may need a set of criteria if we are to start the trend of listing publications like this. Better way would be to substitute 'influential' with 'noteworthy', and then actually assert, in prose, the noteworthiness (i.e. publication X was only possible through the PSB community and resulted in the founding of a new area of scientfic investigation that has ... etc). Without a criteria for 'influential', or a statement of noteworthiness, we will end up listing all the publications that came out of the PSB, in order to be NPOV! Jethero^Talk 00:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Registration typically fills up early

I removed that line. Sounds like advertising, and it was unreferenced. Early compared to what? Why is that important to an encyclopedia article? Perhaps a referenced comment about the level of competition? (what's the manuscript acceptance rate for this conference? What about the allumni return rate? how would that compare to related conferences?) Jethero^Talk 00:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Awards

I have proposed the following section which two editors call promotional/spam/advertising. I hope someone can make them suitable and add them to the page. I am working to find more references.ADP85xzVcQD (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will leave this here a few days. If I don't get any response or suggested edits, I will repost in good faith. There are primary citations. There are secondary citations. It is factual, not advertising, promotional, or spam. It is a science award given at this conference.ADP85xzVcQD (talk) 03:13, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Every year at the conference, two awards are given to honor scientists for their work promoting data sharing and re-use.^[1]^[2] Recipients of the Research Symbiont Award exemplify the principles of data sharing^[3] while the recipients of the Research Parasite Award exemplify the principles of data reuse using secondary data.^[4]^[2] Each year there are two recipients for each award--one early career scientist and one established scientist.^[3]^[4]

References

^ "Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing".
^ ^a ^b Greene, Casey S; Garmire, Lana X; Gilbert, Jack A; Ritchie, Marylyn D; Hunter, Lawrence E (2017). "Celebrating parasites". Nature Genetics. 49 (4): 483–484. doi:10.1038/ng.3830. ISSN 1061-4036.
^ ^a ^b "Research Symbiont Award". Retrieved 17 June 2019.
^ ^a ^b "Research Parasite Award". Retrieved 17 June 2019.

[1] "Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing".

[GreeneGarmire2017-2] Greene, Casey S; Garmire, Lana X; Gilbert, Jack A; Ritchie, Marylyn D; Hunter, Lawrence E (2017). "Celebrating parasites". Nature Genetics. 49 (4): 483–484. doi:10.1038/ng.3830. ISSN 1061-4036.

[symbiont-3] "Research Symbiont Award". Retrieved 17 June 2019.

[parasite-4] "Research Parasite Award". Retrieved 17 June 2019.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]