Talk:Pachakutik Plurinational Unity Movement – New Country

Ecuador Top‑importance

	Ecuador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Start‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

consider merging with Plurinational Unity of the Lefts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.70.18.45 (talk) 14:32, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merged Pachakutik into this page.--The One True Fred 10:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Everybody knows this organisation as "Pachakutik". The full name can be mentioned in the article, but is nor necessary as title. The translation of "unidad" is "unity", not "united"; i.e., the name (in English) is: "Plurinational Unity Movement". Daniel Cordoba-Bahle 15:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Pachakutik Plurinational Unity Movement – New Country. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chavezcode.com/2010/10/behind-coup-in-ecuador-rightwing-attack.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://narcosphere.narconews.com/thefield/4149/statement-ecuadors-most-important-social-movements
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chavezcode.com/2010/10/evidence-of-ned-fundingaid-to-groups-in.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://centrodealerta.org/documentos_desclasificados/usaidned_funding_political_.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050830163041/http://www.pachakutik.org.ec/ to http://www.pachakutik.org.ec/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050830163041/http://www.pachakutik.org.ec/ to http://www.pachakutik.org.ec/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Color

@HapHaxion: Using white as a party color is a real bother in election maps, infobox and diagrams. It's better to avoid it whenever possible. I don't know about the sources saying white is their customary color, but we don't use the customary one either for Allianza Pais. Why not simply use a color of the logo as usual? Purple is on it, it's close to the previous one, and it isn't used by any other ecuadorian party.--Aréat (talk) 13:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this party frequently uses rainbow colours, I would say this is definitely acceptable. Wikipedia, first and foremost, is designed to be easily understood and readily accessible. If including their customary colour would cause unnecessary confusion among readers, and there is an alternative colour that is readily associated with the party, I think it is acceptable to substitute the former for the latter for the sake of clarity. Best regards, Goodposts (talk) 00:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]