Talk:PWS-6
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PWS-6 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from PWS-6 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]Pibwl I have left this article as is. if you see it before someone else edits/assesses it, you can compare it with your PWS-5 article which i have tidied up for you. A couple of pointers: do not delete any of the spec templat you eventually use (this is so future editors can add more info easily or can copy the template for their own use elsewhere. Although there is nothing stopping you using the Specification template to add a text section, you will find tht it will swiftly be editted to leave only the spec template behind, as I have done with the PWS-5 article.Petebutt (talk) 20:54, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class Polish military history articles
- Polish military history task force articles