Talk:POM-2 mine

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Confusing description

What do [1], [2] and [3] mean under the heading Action? They seem to refer to an illustration that isn’t on the page. They should be deleted. Also, Action should be replaced with Function. The text describes how the mine functions. 151.177.73.209 (talk) 13:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The mine contains multiple pyrotechnic retarders, which perform different actions and serve various functions. At the time, I couldn't come up with a more discernible way of differentiating them without a proper illustration showcasing the process of mine deployment. Albeit, I see how it is confusing, so if you have a more understandable way of re-making the explanation in mind, I invite you to, but otherwise the removal of the paragraph is also an option.

And yes, you are right, it does describe the functionality of the mine. Mk0uQ (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incomprehensible description

There is a lot of detail, but I couldn't follow exactly what it does and how it works, which is why I came to this page to start with. I'd suggest a simple, one-sentence description of what it is/what it does at the very beginning. Really, this is not useful as written. Mondebleu (talk) 17:54, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]