Talk:PIK loan

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unclear articles

Payment in kind and PIK loans are both in need of attention of an expert on the subject. No point in merging or keeping them separate if the reader can´t unnderstand. --Adumoul (talk) 15:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unclear introduction

The first phrase is not very clear in the sense that I cannot understand, a priori, why the fact that there is no cash flow from borrower to lender between the drawdown date and the maturity date makes it an expensive instrument. It is more understandable after reading the article, since the interests can be added to the principal (negative amortization) and this does increase the cost of debt. I would suggest removing the THUS adverb in the first phrase. Is it OK? 193.52.24.24 (talk) 16:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Financial_Hazard[reply]