Talk:P90 (disambiguation)

Requested move 6 September 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P90 → P90 (disambiguation) – 99% (Edit: 58% according to Wmcloud) of the time, the term 'P90' refers to the belgian firearm the FN P90. Please move this page to P90 (disambiguation) and redirect the P90 page to the FN P90 page Ultramegavolt (talk) 09:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as lacking substantive arguments or any evidence for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 12:07, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems like FN P90 only gets ~58% of the daily average pageviews of all the articles listed so a far cry from 99%, but it is >2 times more than the second most so I’m not sure if that is enough to make it the the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. cyberdog958^Talk 18:35, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry, 99% is a huge stretch. but the 'P90' most of the time refers to the FN P90. The second place for page views is the Toyota Starlet and 'P90' is just one of the series of the Toyota Scarlet. So I would argue that most of the views were from the Toyota Starlet itself and not the 'P90' series. If we remove Toyota Starlet's viewcount, the FN P90 has 80% of the views vs other P90s Ultramegavolt (talk) 03:26, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support based off that data ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 19:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support based on Massviews [1]. The standard is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC "more likely than all the other topics combined". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P90 now redirects to FN P90, Disambiguations are at P90 (Disambiguation) Ultramegavolt (talk) 08:42, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure your move was made in good faith, but please note that at the top of this discussion, it says "The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions)." You also moved it to P90 (Disambiguation), rather than the proposed target of P90 (disambiguation). An editor with pagemove privileges can assist you with that move, if the consensus at the end of the discussion is to move. Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 09:52, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I only needed to wait for consensus, for a requested move, do i still need to wait for consensus if move it to an empty page? Ultramegavolt (talk) 10:28, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone on my talk page told me i can just move the page. Ultramegavolt (talk) 10:30, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, we have to wait at least seven days, to try give other editors a chance to contribute to the discussion. Please be patient, thanks.

Please also note that since you opened this move discussion, you can't close it yourself. I've stayed out of the discussion so far, as I have no opinion on the title, so you can either request an admin to close the discussion (after at least seven days), or I'll be happy to close it for you if you like. Wikishovel (talk) 10:37, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for the explanaion. Sorry for wasting your time. Ultramegavolt (talk) 12:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per pageview data. Bensci54 (talk) 17:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I closed this early by mistake, apologies! I have reverted my actions. Hopefully I haven't caused too much disruption, although to be honest this one may have been closeable, I didn't want to break policy. ASUKITE 03:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.