Talk:P600
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the P600 page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Syntactic and therefore semantic?
[edit]I'm not a neurolinguist, but the word “semantic” does not make any sense to me in the first sentence of the section on elicitation: The P600 was originally considered a "syntactic" ERP, and therefore is elicited by several types of semantic phenomena, including ungrammatical stimuli, garden path sentences [...] How about substituting “syntactic”? --Thüringer ☼ (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks like that must have been a typo. rʨanaɢ (talk) 10:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)