Talk:P. Kodanda Rao/GA1

GA Review

Passed. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 05:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DreamRimmer (talk · contribs) 17:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this one for you. Expect comments within a few days. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 17:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At first glance, I haven't seen anything amiss and am double-checking all of the additional points. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 12:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Career

In second paragraph's second line, please change He accompanied Sastri to the Round Table Conferences in London and in South Africa. to He accompanied Sastri to the Round Table Conferences in London and South Africa. (or simply remove the in from South Africa)

Done

In second paragraph's fourth line, please change He was also the member of the Indian delegation to the Round Table Conferences between India and South Africa in 1926 and 1932. to He was also a member of the Indian delegation to the Round Table Conferences between India and South Africa in 1926 and 1932. (or simply alt the article with a)

Done

In third paragraph's last line, please change In one of those letters Gandhi clarified the role of Henry David Thoreau in shaping Gandhi's views on Civil resistance. to In one of those letters, Gandhi clarified the role of Henry David Thoreau in shaping his views on Civil resistance.

Done

The fourth paragraph of the career section had some grammar issues, so I fixed some. Please check, and if everything is okay, then replace it with the below paragraph.

Rao wrote extensively in various journals on topics relating to Indians overseas, emigration, and immigration, and Indian politics under British Rule. Writing in The New York Times in 1935, he decried the Government of India Act 1935 as limiting and preventing the country from moving towards freedom and a dominion status. He also wrote books including East vs West: Denial of Contrast, Culture Conflicts: Cause and Cure, and Foreign Friends of India's Freedom. Rao's book, Foreign Friends of India's Freedom, was a collection of broadcasts commissioned by the All India Radio on the 25th anniversary of India's independence. Rao was the recipient of the Sangeet Natak Akademi Award in 1963.

Done

Why are there double and in the following paragraph? If it was left by mistake, then it should be corrected.

Rao wrote extensively in various journals on topics relating to Indians overseas, emigration, and immigration, and Indian politics under the British Rule.

Done

In the last paragraph of the career section: Please replace Rao also served on various governmental committees including serving on the Madhya Pradesh Prohibition Enquiry Committee (1951) set up by the Government of Madhya Pradesh. with Rao also served on various governmental committees, including the Madhya Pradesh Prohibition Enquiry Committee (1951), set up by the Government of Madhya Pradesh.

Done. Thanks for the very detailed notes. Have covered all of them, I think. Ktin (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal life

First paragraph's last line read: He also dedicated his book Foreign friends of India's freedom to his wife.

Please add a comma after First paragraph's last line read: He also dedicated his book

Done

Please fix book name: Foreign friends of India's freedom to Foreign Friends of India's Freedom

Done

Published works

Checked. all okay.

References

References checked by me (see data below)

Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked ✗ Fail Heuristics resolved as likely dead (Please replace with reliable sources; if the issue is temporary, then no changes are needed.)

Might have been temporary? Have added an archive link - please have a look. Ktin (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked ✗ Fail Connection failed or remote server error (Please replace with reliable sources; if the issue is temporary, then no changes are needed.)

Might have been temporary? Have added an archive link - please have a look. Ktin (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y
Reliable/Statement covered: checked Y

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
pass

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
no issues

C. It contains no original research:
checked, no issues.

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
checked, Both a manual spot check and a copyvio detector encountered nothing.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
checked, no issues.

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
focused on the topic, pass
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Pass, no issues.
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
checked, no edit-wars.
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
no issues, pass

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
checked, no issues.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

@DreamRimmer: Many thanks for this very thoughtful review. I will work on this in the next couple of days, and will share an update. Thanks. Ktin (talk) 17:12, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer thanks for your patience. I think I have addressed the feedback. Please have a look and let me know if I can help with any additional edits. Ktin (talk) 01:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work @Ktin, promoting it as GA. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 05:51, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.