Talk:P.S. I Love You (Robin Daggers song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DannyS712 (talk · contribs) 01:26, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- Only issues that Earwig's finds are quotes
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Quite broad in coverage
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Generally adheres to NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Fairly stable article
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- 1 tagged non-free image (File:PSILoveYou.jpg) which has a fair use rationale, and 3 other images from commons.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Passes GA
- Pass/Fail:
Notes
[edit]- Done Can the sentence
The song appeared in an episode of the same name which aired on February 4, 2013, where Sparkles hits her breaking point and changes her stage name to Robin Daggers in 1996.
be rephrased?- New sentence:
It appeared in an episode of the same name which aired on February 4, 2013. In the episode, Sparkles hits her breaking point and changes her stage name to Robin Daggers in 1996.
- the second sentence doesn't need to be part of the lede, since it is only for context.
- New sentence:
- Done Can the sentence
The music video for "P.S. I Love You" and the 175th episode were directed by Pamela Fryman.
be clarified? Is it that the music video was for both "P.S. I Love You" and the episode, or that both the music video and the episode were directed by Fryman?- New sentence:
The music video for "P.S. I Love You", as well as the 175th episode, was directed by Pamela Fryman.
- the issue is still there, and perhaps even more so than earlier. What did Fryman direct, and what was the music for? Maybe (using active voice): "Pamela Fryman directed both the 175th episode of HIMYM and music video for "P.S. I Love You""? Or even cut the part about the 175th episode, since it doesn't add much to the article and is a bit confusing.
- New sentence:
- Done Why does P.S. I Love You (Robin Daggers song)#Release need a table for only 1 row?
- Done For the 3rd and 4th images, can the captions use parallel structures? Currently:
The writers were inspired by Alanis Morissette's "You Oughta Know".
, andCourtney Love inspired Daggers' look in the video
- were inspired by vs inspired / active vs passive voice
Discussion
[edit]- I am placing this on hold pending resolution of the issues identified above --DannyS712 (talk) 01:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- That was fast. Thank you for the review. I fixed everything you mentioned above. Damian Vo (talk) Damian Vo (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Damian Vo: thanks, but some of the issues are still there. See updated review above --DannyS712 (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Done :) Damian Vo (talk) 02:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Damian Vo: then this passes! --DannyS712 (talk) 02:52, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Done :) Damian Vo (talk) 02:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Damian Vo: thanks, but some of the issues are still there. See updated review above --DannyS712 (talk) 02:29, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- That was fast. Thank you for the review. I fixed everything you mentioned above. Damian Vo (talk) Damian Vo (talk) 02:02, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.